Vaccine Passports

It was never 3 weeks to flatten the curve. They lied to you, and it was planned.

The plan was to implement medical fascism. This was the evil some people felt in the ether (spiritually, psychologically) when Boris Johnson announced lockdown in early 2020. There was a palpable shift that some people felt; many did not feel this. I felt it; I felt a very dark veil come across the world. I knew this was a very bad and nefarious thing that was happening. It was difficult to put words to it. It had the energy of some kind of curse, of some kind of spiritual attack. It was huge. Call it what you will: spiritual intuition, gut instinct, an openness to divine energies, etc., etc.

Anyhow, I came across David Hughes’ articles on the spectre of mandatory vaccines. It reminded me on my article I wrote on UK column. Link to David Hughes article here:

It was never 3 weeks to flatten the curve. The plan was to make the jabs mandatory in early 2020. There is a paper trail. VACCINE PASSPORTS WERE DISCUSSED BY UK GOVERNMENT IN APRIL 2020. Susan Michie let this cat out the back in May 2020 in a British Psychological Society webinar that most people have never seen. They were hellbent on entering the new normal of medical fascism. They still are. These facts are little known. I have broadcast these ideas for a few years now. Of course, heavily censored. From my article in the UK column “Menticide 101 and the Brainwashing of a World: Part II—Beyond The Fear” Link here

Quote from article begins

“Not just the Soviets

From a public health perspective, it is surprising and highly concerning that the UK Government and devolved administrations have deliberately, on the advice of psychologists from the ukcolumn.org/search behavioural committee of the Government’s scientific advisory body SAGE and from the Behavioural Insights Team at the Cabinet Office, used—and are still using—methods derived from Pavlov in their response to Covid-19, the supposed climate emergency and the Ukraine war; methods which are making us all psychologically and physically unwell.

For Laura Dodsworth’s book (see note below this quote from my article on the testimony of the psychologists in Dodsworth’s book). goodreads.com/en/book/s…, the author interviewed psychologist members of SPI-B. Some were prepared to admit that their tactics may have been ethically dubious, some felt uncomfortable, and some said they thought the tactics necessary. Unfortunately, the interviews with the psychologists are just not credible. Knowing psychologists as I do (I trained as one), I am aware that they pride themselves, to the point of arrogance, on being able to decipher data and being able to conduct themselves in their actions to the highest possible ethical standards.

The members of SPI-B interviewed by Dodsworth never seemed to query the actual risk of Covid-19, but take the hype around Covid-19 as a given. More importantly, it is just not credible that the psychologists did not know that they were breaking the ethical and practice guidelines of the British Psychological Society; see my earlier article ukcolumn.org/article/ps…in the ukcolumn.org/topic/mind…ukcolumn.org/topic/mind… of the UK Column website.

Why am I so sure that the psychologists interviewed for State of Fear are dissembling?

Firstly, they would be well aware of the ethical duties contained within their code of conduct and of how tactics that deliberately make people fearful were completely against the code of ethics.

Secondly, and more importantly, the Head of Policy of the British Psychological Society, Kathryn Scott, is a member of SPI-B of SAGE; it is just not possible that the group of psychologists on SPI-B did not realise that they had torn up the ethical rule book of their very own profession. It must be noted that both the British Psychological Society (BPS) and its regulator, the Health and Care Professions Council, have been eerily silent over—or have flatly denied—the unethical nature of the work of psychologists in SPI-B. Indeed, the British Psychological Society supported and praised the work of Professor Susan Michie after she was “attacked” on social media for her role in the fearmongering by SPI-B.

Besides the incredibly poor ethical knowledge purportedly displayed by the psychologists in Dodsworth’s book, another clue which certainly points to the deliberate nature of their tactics is from a webinar, youtube.com/watch?v=wJc…, actually bps.org.uk/covid-19-vid…, which was recorded on 5 May 2020. The panel featured Susan Michie and Kathryn Scott. The discussion clearly shows that the British public was being deceived and lied to by the UK Government about what was taking place in early 2020; it was never intended to be “three weeks to flatten the curve” when that phrase was intoned on 23 March 2020. The psychologists in the webinar discussed how immunity passports were already being discussed prior to May 2020, and that the public was being manipulated (unawares, without informed consent) for behaviour change to a “new normal”. I must conclude that there was no intention, even then, that old freedoms were going to be returned.

This indicates that the psychologists in Dodsworth’s book were not being truthful about the extent of what they knew and the plans which the UK Government had in store for us. In the video of the May 2020 BPS webinar, at the 24-minute mark (youtube.com/watch?v=wJc…), Professor Susan Michie mentions that the issue of immunity passports was committees.parliament.u… on 28 April 2020.

It was never “three weeks to flatten the curve”, to “save the NHS”. That was a blatant lie.”

Quote from the article ends.

ps. Take note. The Psychologists in Dodsworth’s book know ethics. Many of them sit on ethics boards in Universities. They knew what they were doing was wrong. They did not suddenly come to realise that they had crossed a boundary. Psychologists need to get ethical informed consent to show undergraduates in psychological research pictures of snakes and spiders and teddy bears. They need to debrief participants and make sure they are not traumatised by the experimental intervention. The testimony of the psychologists in Dodsworth’s book is fiction.

Links to my other UK column articles on the use of applied psychology: Link here